In a
previous article, I discussed a new economic reality and what companies can do
to preserve jobs in a down economy. As I continue addressing this issue with
former CEOs, I find myself peeling the subject in layers as though peeling an
onion.
As I
have stated in the past, it is easy to layoff people or close manufacturing
plants when the economy slows. It seems our business schools have not
considered another possibility and we are perpetually stuck with laying people
off to preserve profits.
At the
same time, when you examine closely, you see this method is extremely
unprofitable. Why? When you layoff a percentage of people to save a million
dollars, for example, you don’t openly discuss the repercussions. If your
enterprise is to remain a going concern, you will eventually have to hire
people to fill those vacant positions. When you rehire, you have to factor in
the associated costs to fill the position. You have to advertise for the
positions. You interview candidates which is time and then you train those
people. The real dollar costs could be $3 million on a $1 million savings. That
does not factor the intangible costs of lower quality customer experience that
tarnishes your brand because former employees may have had better knowledge of
customers’ needs. As the layoff strategy incurs costs greater than the savings,
it makes sense for many leaders to orchestrate financial engineering to hide
the backlash of the unprofitable layoff strategy.
As an
alternative strategy, consider the horse and buggy industry. As the
proliferation of automobiles continued in the late 1800s, those horse and buggy
companies changed their model. They started manufacturing cars. In this
example, the move was reactionary. As technology and outsourcing continue to
encroach on today’s industries, a proactive plan is needed.
In
another example, with the expansion of the digital age, paper manufacturers may
be squeezed. Instead of shutting down plants, transform plants or look for new
business abroad. As people use less paper and third world countries increase
prosperity, new needs will arise. Furthermore, the global population continues
to grow. Therefore, one opportunity for a paper mill is to transform the
facility in whole or part from paper for newspapers and periodicals to toilet
paper. This is an area technology cannot easily replace. In fact, with an
increase in population and more countries participating in global commerce,
this commodity will experience increased demand.
However,
this should not be a reactionary strategy like the horse and buggy companies.
To thrive as your current industry dies, you should have your employees
participate in this strategy. Have production look at the necessary equipment
to make the change. Sales and
marketing should be researching new markets in the US and abroad. They should
be talking to current and prospective customers as well as distributors and
suppliers. In addition, it may be worthwhile to invest in training for key personnel in the targeted commodity.
If
leadership takes on the mindset that they are constantly training employees to
mitigate the risks of a dying or transforming industry, they will have to think
about training staff and management to perform in new territory. Even if your
industry is bulletproof, it would be wise to use this strategy to navigate
through recessions. That way you are less likely to fall into the cycle of
laying people off and later filling the position with someone else. There are
always new opportunities that can be exploited when faced with chaos.
What do you think? I’m open to ideas. Or if you want to
write me about a specific topic, let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment