In the US, organizations have 2 gears for running a
business. During good times, hire people. When the economy slows, fire people.
In almost every case, this strategy results in a downward spiral for the
economy. While there are infinite alternatives to this tactic, no one has taken
sufficient time to explore and develop it. At the same time, in the 21st
Century, change happens faster than ever. As a result, many of the existing
economic structures have become obsolete. Therefore, the time is now to explore
new possibilities.
If you think about it, there has to be a
rock that no one
has looked under. Under that rock are effective alternatives to the firing
frenzy. Perhaps the solution is a matter of how we view human capital.
In my company, I do business with many former CEOs of
Fortune 500s. One day I decided to engage a retired CEO of a well-known Fortune
100. I presented the idea that companies lay off people when the economy slows
and that exacerbates poor economic conditions. When 100 companies lay off
10,000 people, 1 million consumers lose their purchasing power. That results in
more companies laying off people and an unhealthy economy. That is analogous to
17th Century doctors who did not wash their hands before operating
on patients. The result was more patients died from infections. Doctors were
killing off their own patients because no one figured out that washing your
hands was essential to the health of the patient. In the future, they may think
our method of firing people when the economy slows was suicidal?
With that said, in my conversation with this former CEO, I
asserted there has to be a possibility no one has considered. Through that
possibility, employees would be so valuable it would be more expensive to lay
them off than it is to keep them. His first response was the problem is that no
one thinks about that until they are under pressure from slow growth. At that
point, the natural response is to fire people. Furthermore, he said, no one has
paid a group of people to meet in a room and remain there until they find an
effective solution to your question.
If that is the case, I am opening the conversation up to the
business community. Imagine your employees provide a value to the enterprise
that by far exceeds the value of what you pay them. To lay them off would cost
exceedingly more than the value you receive from them. In fact, your employees
would be so valuable that you are able to transfer that value to your balance
sheet. It would sit in the balance sheet as human capital. For example, in the
event you wanted to sell your company, human capital would increase the value
of the organization by $100 million for a company with $1 billion in revenues.
While this seems far-fetched or mathematically impossible,
in an age of knowledge workers and service companies, it is a possibility. In
our current paradigm, it appears impossible. It is just a matter of structuring
an enterprise to leverage human capital in a way that it has not been done. The
result would be a formidable company in a global economy.
In the 90 minutes I spent discussing this topic with the
retired CEO, he and I peeled the subject down in layers, like peeling an onion.
We may have uncovered a blanket solution for businesses. Except, it was not
“THE” solution. The solution he and I agreed on was training. In his most
recent experience, he spoke of a company where he sits on the board. He bought
the company when he was still CEO at the Fortune 100. At the time, it had 43
employees. It was later spun off. The company has continued to grow even during
the economic down turn and it now has over 100,000 employees. He attributed
that to the amount of money they invested in employee training.
If training is one of ways to make employees more valuable,
it time to reconsider what training looks like. If the goal were to make them
so valuable that to lay them off is more expensive than it is to keep them,
what would you train them to do or think that they are not doing or thinking
now?
When this problem is solved, the US will have a New Economic
Reality.
What do you think? I’m open to ideas. Or if you want to
write me about a specific topic, let me know.
Thankfulness to my father who told me about this website,
ReplyDeletethis webpage is in fact awesome.
Nuvocleanse Reviews :: ::
Thank you. You are very kind. I appreciate your comment. Tell your father I said thank you as well.
DeleteOutstanding article Ted, which I came to read as a link from within another one of your articles. I have to get back to that article, but I'm thinking that the type of training to make people invaluable is replacing "spectator" mentality with "action taking" decision making effectiveness. Many times there are too many soldiers waiting for the generals to tell them what to do, when staff already the course of action to take.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Carl. You always give such thoughtful comments.
DeleteYou would have found this article from a link on another article called, Corporations Need People.
From what you are saying, people need to develop leadership skills so they can powerfully take initiative that contributes to the growth of the business. Without those leadership skills, they do as you say, wait for for someone to tell them what to do.