Every day you can
find a new article or interview questioning whether a man or a woman makes a
better leader. At the end of the article, all that is left is one more dagger
for a person to throw at the opposite sex.
The discussion of
who is better is a definite way to waste a person’s brain cells. The truth is
that not all
men are committed to being a leader. Therefore, not all men make
good leaders. The same exact philosophy goes for women. Those
who are committed to being a good manager will take the necessary steps to
develop themselves as a leader and those who don’t will play a different role
in an organization. It is not a crime to not want to be a leader.
The hype that is
created about who is better only feeds the flame of animosity and victimhood.
And a very powerful former CEO of a Fortune 500 once told me that victims never
get to have fun. For that matter, neither do those who hold animosity.
If the instigators,
disguised as so-called experts about gender issues disappeared, men and women
would have to learn to cooperate together. Leaders would rise within a group or
organization. Those with the highest commitment to lead would create
situations, find mentors or programs that make them better at leadership – the
ability to execute a vision through others.
The best leaders
are not the smartest person in the group. In fact, if they are, they do not put
it in your face. Yet, there are many people screaming that they deserve to be a
leader on the basis of being smarter than others. While it may be true you are
smarter, this does not mean you work well with others, nor does it mean you can
inspire others to accomplish great tasks. This dilemma has nothing to do with
gender. Both men and women have a tendency to want to prove their intelligence at the expense of others. This is the exact behavior that demoralizes teams and organizations, unless you are highly skilled at communicating tough conversations and difficult ideals. It could be said that Steve Jobs was gifted
in this way.
With that said,
others believe that leadership is a popularity contest. They operate with the
philosophy that they have to get people to like them in order to induce others
to follow them. This failed approach is also not a result of gender.
The best managers
are respected for their stand. People tend to follow them because they are
consistent, decisive and firm in their direction. They are capable of tough conversations and they create stretch goals that serve as development
opportunities. This often means people are not always happy while working with
them. However, the leader does not lose his focus and he is not distracted by
the desire to make people like him nor is she out to prove that she is the
smartest. In the face of difficulty, they still inspire you.
If there is a gap,
there are two. One is the belief that men and women should compete for who’s
the best. A better way to look at men and women is to acknowledge that we
complement one another. Neither is more important than the other. The second
gap is development. Leadership belongs to those who desire it most. The best
leaders will always rise in the crowd because they have taken the initiative to
develop themselves. If you view management in the same way you view the arts or
sports, you will see that it takes a certain mindset and a lot of practice.
Those who refuse to follow the development path eventually fall into the famous
Weissman Principle.
What
steps have you taken to develop yourself today?
What do you think? I’m open to ideas. Or if you want to
write me about a specific topic, let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment