Over the weekend, I spent a few
hours with the older gentleman I know.
His wisdom is exceptional.
And I’m always prepared to hear what is on his mind. As usual, he engaged me in a thought
provoking conversation that may cross the boundaries of political
correctness. At the same time, it
is a valuable conversation I would like to share.
He started with the following: It is
a parent’s job to prepare their children for life. When they are negligent in that job, the child could grow up
to be
a disadvantaged adult. And
the child may not have the means and wherewithal to make up the
difference. In the future, will
children be able to sue their parents for this negligence? Sound farfetched. Consider the following.
The average weight for a newborn is
7.5 pounds. The average weight for
a 5’9” adult male is around 170 pounds.
The average weight for a 5’4” adult female is about 115 pounds. If a boy and girl of average height
reach the weight of 170 and 115 pounds respectively by age10 year, who is
responsible for their overweight bodies?
What are the repercussions?
If you were to say the children are
responsible for eating too much, that would let the parents off the hook. When you have a child, you assume
fiduciary responsibility for that child’s physical and emotional
well-being. Furthermore, as a
parent, you are responsible for preparing your children for life as an adult. While ensuring they receive a formal
education is one aspect, physical health can be detrimental to an individual’s
future.
While the US enforces political
correctness, in that we are not supposed to condemn others for disabilities,
race, gender or physical appearance, discrimination is widely practiced by the
majority of people. For example,
the above-mentioned overweight girl could easily become a 5’4” adult at 200
pounds. At that weight and height,
she could easily become the victim of diabetes, high blood pressure, heart
failure, depression, etc. Some
people may discriminate against her in job interviews. Her dreams of being a professional
athlete would have died on the vine.
And her choice of a spouse would most likely be limited. That is a short list of her
disadvantages.
If a parent has the fiduciary
responsibility of preparing a child for a successful future, it would seem the
parents failed. The girl above
would incur many health care expenses and opportunity costs for job and spouse
prospects. Are parents liable for
those extraneous expenses and losses?
If so, does that mean children will one day be able to sue their parents
for parental malpractice – negligence?
Hopefully the world does not come to
that. At the same time, there
should be a wake up call for people considering having children. No parent has the right to bring a
child into the world if they are not prepared to give the child normal
advantages, like great health, emotional stability, knowledge through education
and experience, etc. While it can
be advantageous to have a child explore the world at a young age, it is not
necessary. It is important for a
child to have working knowledge of self, communication and physical
health. What advantages will you
give your children?
What do you
think? I would love to hear your feedback. And I’m open to ideas. Or if you
want to write me about a specific topic, let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment